<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Are You Crippled By Unfollow Fear?</title> <atom:link href="http://twittercism.com/unfollow-fear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://twittercism.com/unfollow-fear/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:25:23 +0100</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: 4 Ways to Be Successful on Twitter &#171; Miranda Vande Kuyt</title><link>http://twittercism.com/unfollow-fear/comment-page-1/#comment-16807</link> <dc:creator>4 Ways to Be Successful on Twitter &#171; Miranda Vande Kuyt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:15:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twittercism.com/?p=1682#comment-16807</guid> <description>[...] Unfollow people that do not share valuable information [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unfollow people that do not share valuable information [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tony Hurst</title><link>http://twittercism.com/unfollow-fear/comment-page-1/#comment-16540</link> <dc:creator>Tony Hurst</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:29:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twittercism.com/?p=1682#comment-16540</guid> <description>I follow people that I want to talk with or listen to. I expect people to evaluate me in the same way in these venues.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I follow people that I want to talk with or listen to. I expect people to evaluate me in the same way in these venues.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nrgins</title><link>http://twittercism.com/unfollow-fear/comment-page-1/#comment-16531</link> <dc:creator>nrgins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:47:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twittercism.com/?p=1682#comment-16531</guid> <description>Well, I think we&#039;re talking about two different things here. I&#039;m not talking about automatic unfollows. I&#039;m talking about unfollows that happen within an hour or two because a person received notification. It all hinges on what is meant by &quot;they immediately drop you.&quot; Does &quot;immediately&quot; mean within a minute or two, or within an hour or two?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In any case, the only issue I had was the absolute terms you couched your statement in. &quot;It’s because they’re using a script&quot;; &quot;the two of you never made a valid connection, and never will.&quot; I don&#039;t think those statements are absolutely true. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you&#039;re saying, on the other hand, &quot;most of the time&quot; and &quot;probably,&quot; then I don&#039;t have a problem with it. But I don&#039;t think your statements apply to every situation where someone drops you shortly after you drop them, is all I&#039;m saying.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think we&#39;re talking about two different things here. I&#39;m not talking about automatic unfollows. I&#39;m talking about unfollows that happen within an hour or two because a person received notification. It all hinges on what is meant by &#8220;they immediately drop you.&#8221; Does &#8220;immediately&#8221; mean within a minute or two, or within an hour or two?</p><p>In any case, the only issue I had was the absolute terms you couched your statement in. &#8220;It’s because they’re using a script&#8221;; &#8220;the two of you never made a valid connection, and never will.&#8221; I don&#39;t think those statements are absolutely true.</p><p>If you&#39;re saying, on the other hand, &#8220;most of the time&#8221; and &#8220;probably,&#8221; then I don&#39;t have a problem with it. But I don&#39;t think your statements apply to every situation where someone drops you shortly after you drop them, is all I&#39;m saying.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sheamus</title><link>http://twittercism.com/unfollow-fear/comment-page-1/#comment-16530</link> <dc:creator>Sheamus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:24:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twittercism.com/?p=1682#comment-16530</guid> <description>It&#039;s not &#039;just wrong&#039;. In my experience in the *vast* majority of cases an automated unfollow following a manual one at your end means there was little to no connection. There are always going to be exceptions, but that&#039;s the norm. Sometimes people using auto-unfollowers later follow back (once they realise you&#039;ve gone), but the majority are never seen again. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think we&#039;re confusing my use of the word &#039;connection&#039;. I just don&#039;t mean you&#039;ve exchanged a couple of tweets some time in the past. I&#039;m talking predominately about the accounts that follow tens of thousands of people here. They don&#039;t notice and most of the time they don&#039;t care. Those following just a couple of hundred or less do notice, and often will care.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The SocialToo emails allow me to see all this happening and in those cases where it seems an unusual decision (because there IS a connection) then like you I&#039;ll usually follow it up. Often this reveals that it was a mistake, or the other user is having a big reboot and you got caught up in that. Sometimes it&#039;s very intentional, and the information sent back as to why that decision was made can be of some benefit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And yes, sometimes feelings to get hurt. It&#039;s real people, after all. But if you just boot somebody simply and only because they booted you, without finding out what happened and why, then I&#039;d argue that any &#039;connection&#039; probably wasn&#039;t all that important to either of you. It became simply a matter of saving face and personal pride, which is an absolutely valid, but very different thing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s not &#39;just wrong&#39;. In my experience in the *vast* majority of cases an automated unfollow following a manual one at your end means there was little to no connection. There are always going to be exceptions, but that&#39;s the norm. Sometimes people using auto-unfollowers later follow back (once they realise you&#39;ve gone), but the majority are never seen again.</p><p>I think we&#39;re confusing my use of the word &#39;connection&#39;. I just don&#39;t mean you&#39;ve exchanged a couple of tweets some time in the past. I&#39;m talking predominately about the accounts that follow tens of thousands of people here. They don&#39;t notice and most of the time they don&#39;t care. Those following just a couple of hundred or less do notice, and often will care.</p><p>The SocialToo emails allow me to see all this happening and in those cases where it seems an unusual decision (because there IS a connection) then like you I&#39;ll usually follow it up. Often this reveals that it was a mistake, or the other user is having a big reboot and you got caught up in that. Sometimes it&#39;s very intentional, and the information sent back as to why that decision was made can be of some benefit.</p><p>And yes, sometimes feelings to get hurt. It&#39;s real people, after all. But if you just boot somebody simply and only because they booted you, without finding out what happened and why, then I&#39;d argue that any &#39;connection&#39; probably wasn&#39;t all that important to either of you. It became simply a matter of saving face and personal pride, which is an absolutely valid, but very different thing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nrgins</title><link>http://twittercism.com/unfollow-fear/comment-page-1/#comment-16529</link> <dc:creator>nrgins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:53:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twittercism.com/?p=1682#comment-16529</guid> <description>Yes, I realize that wasn&#039;t the point of the piece. And so my comments were a little out of context. Still, regardless of the context, the part about there being no connection if someone unfollows you because they&#039;re using a script is just wrong.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even defining a &quot;script&quot; as anything, even just a notification e-mail (as opposed to the way I would define it, which is something that automatically follows/unfollows), that still doesn&#039;t negate the point.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If someone uses a &quot;script&quot; in that they receive notification whenever someone unfollows them, and then they choose to unfollow you, that doesn&#039;t mean there wasn&#039;t a &quot;connection.&quot; It could mean several things.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) It could mean that the connection was there, but wasn&#039;t very deep. When you unfollow them, they reciprocate, since they&#039;re not interested in a one-way connection. But to say there was &quot;no connection&quot; simply because it may not have been a close connection is simply false.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) It may have been a close connection, and the person may be offended by the unfollow, and may reciprocate because they&#039;re offended or their feelings are hurt. Again, unfollowing here doesn&#039;t mean there wasn&#039;t a connection. In fact, in this case, it may actually be proof of a connection.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If someone that I had a very close connection to unfollowed me, I&#039;d probably send them a note asking about it (though I wouldn&#039;t be able to DM). But there&#039;s a wide range of people short of that, with whom I don&#039;t have a deep connection, but with whom I still have a substantial connection, with whom, if they unfollowed me, I&#039;d probably unfollow back, simply because I&#039;m offended. That doesn&#039;t mean there was no connection there.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I realize that wasn&#39;t the point of the piece. And so my comments were a little out of context. Still, regardless of the context, the part about there being no connection if someone unfollows you because they&#39;re using a script is just wrong.</p><p>Even defining a &#8220;script&#8221; as anything, even just a notification e-mail (as opposed to the way I would define it, which is something that automatically follows/unfollows), that still doesn&#39;t negate the point.</p><p>If someone uses a &#8220;script&#8221; in that they receive notification whenever someone unfollows them, and then they choose to unfollow you, that doesn&#39;t mean there wasn&#39;t a &#8220;connection.&#8221; It could mean several things.</p><p>1) It could mean that the connection was there, but wasn&#39;t very deep. When you unfollow them, they reciprocate, since they&#39;re not interested in a one-way connection. But to say there was &#8220;no connection&#8221; simply because it may not have been a close connection is simply false.</p><p>2) It may have been a close connection, and the person may be offended by the unfollow, and may reciprocate because they&#39;re offended or their feelings are hurt. Again, unfollowing here doesn&#39;t mean there wasn&#39;t a connection. In fact, in this case, it may actually be proof of a connection.</p><p>If someone that I had a very close connection to unfollowed me, I&#39;d probably send them a note asking about it (though I wouldn&#39;t be able to DM). But there&#39;s a wide range of people short of that, with whom I don&#39;t have a deep connection, but with whom I still have a substantial connection, with whom, if they unfollowed me, I&#39;d probably unfollow back, simply because I&#39;m offended. That doesn&#39;t mean there was no connection there.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: kundenserver.de @ 2010-03-14 05:17:46 by W3 Total Cache -->