<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: On Twitter, 10% Account For 90% Of All Tweets, The Rest Barely Tweet At All, And Men Like Other Men</title> <atom:link href="http://twittercism.com/twitter-harvard-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://twittercism.com/twitter-harvard-study/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:20:16 +0100</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: wervingsvisies &#187; Het blog van Wervingsvisie.nl &#187; Follow &#8211; unfollow</title><link>http://twittercism.com/twitter-harvard-study/comment-page-1/#comment-16859</link> <dc:creator>wervingsvisies &#187; Het blog van Wervingsvisie.nl &#187; Follow &#8211; unfollow</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:50:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twittercism.com/?p=1281#comment-16859</guid> <description>[...] 104 Tweeps en daar zit een flink aantal tussen waar ik nooit iets van hoor. Wat niet zo gek is: uit onderzoek vorig jaar bleek dat 10% van de Twitteraars verantwoordelijk is voor 90% van de tweets. Vergeleken [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 104 Tweeps en daar zit een flink aantal tussen waar ik nooit iets van hoor. Wat niet zo gek is: uit onderzoek vorig jaar bleek dat 10% van de Twitteraars verantwoordelijk is voor 90% van de tweets. Vergeleken [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Twitter Friday: We’re Not for Sale but Our Accounts Are &#124; Online SEO Blogger &#124; Basic Seo Tips &#124; Advanced Seo Tips &#124; Seo Busines</title><link>http://twittercism.com/twitter-harvard-study/comment-page-1/#comment-11803</link> <dc:creator>Twitter Friday: We’re Not for Sale but Our Accounts Are &#124; Online SEO Blogger &#124; Basic Seo Tips &#124; Advanced Seo Tips &#124; Seo Busines</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:15:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twittercism.com/?p=1281#comment-11803</guid> <description>[...] often ridiculed social media consultants, marketers as well as bloggers and other web workers are the most active hard core of the Twitter user base. All these people are potential business users. They&#8217;re freelancers, entrepreneurs or [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] often ridiculed social media consultants, marketers as well as bloggers and other web workers are the most active hard core of the Twitter user base. All these people are potential business users. They&#8217;re freelancers, entrepreneurs or [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Twitter Friday: We&#8217;re Not for Sale but Our Accounts Are &#124; SEOptimise</title><link>http://twittercism.com/twitter-harvard-study/comment-page-1/#comment-11525</link> <dc:creator>Twitter Friday: We&#8217;re Not for Sale but Our Accounts Are &#124; SEOptimise</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:51:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twittercism.com/?p=1281#comment-11525</guid> <description>[...] often ridiculed social media consultants, marketers as well as bloggers and other web workers are the most active hard core of the Twitter user base. All these people are potential business users. They&#8217;re freelancers, entrepreneurs or [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] often ridiculed social media consultants, marketers as well as bloggers and other web workers are the most active hard core of the Twitter user base. All these people are potential business users. They&#8217;re freelancers, entrepreneurs or [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alarming Twitter Survey</title><link>http://twittercism.com/twitter-harvard-study/comment-page-1/#comment-6022</link> <dc:creator>Alarming Twitter Survey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:21:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twittercism.com/?p=1281#comment-6022</guid> <description>[...] seems to be in line with recent data collected and shared via a Harvard study. Twitter tends to skew older, there is a strong 90/10 rule, and men tend to follow other men.  [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seems to be in line with recent data collected and shared via a Harvard study. Twitter tends to skew older, there is a strong 90/10 rule, and men tend to follow other men.  [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rlamfink</title><link>http://twittercism.com/twitter-harvard-study/comment-page-1/#comment-4543</link> <dc:creator>rlamfink</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:33:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twittercism.com/?p=1281#comment-4543</guid> <description>Great analysis of the study from the viewpoint of an actual Twitter user who understands the situational dynamics.Regarding men following women: The first time I considered following a female, I wondered if that was ok. But she was an interesting person (and funny), so that initial reaction soon gave way to rational thought. Now gender doesn&#039;t even come in to play at all when a follow decision is made.(And thanks for mentioning UnTweeps again.)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great analysis of the study from the viewpoint of an actual Twitter user who understands the situational dynamics.</p><p>Regarding men following women: The first time I considered following a female, I wondered if that was ok. But she was an interesting person (and funny), so that initial reaction soon gave way to rational thought. Now gender doesn&#8217;t even come in to play at all when a follow decision is made.</p><p>(And thanks for mentioning UnTweeps again.)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: kundenserver.de @ 2010-03-18 05:31:31 by W3 Total Cache -->