<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: You Are The Average Of The Five People You Spend The Most Tweets With</title> <atom:link href="http://twittercism.com/five-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://twittercism.com/five-people/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:17:38 +0100</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Sheamus</title><link>http://twittercism.com/five-people/comment-page-1/#comment-655</link> <dc:creator>Sheamus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:50:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twittercism.com/?p=917#comment-655</guid> <description>I agree Tina. I think increasingly smart people on Twitter are realising that the number of followers you have is far less important as to &lt;i&gt;who&lt;/i&gt; is following you. A network made off a few hundred interesting, engaging and content sharing folk is far more powerful than 10,000 who ignore you. I think increasingly it&#039;s going to become about optimisation.Thanks for your comment. :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Tina. I think increasingly smart people on Twitter are realising that the number of followers you have is far less important as to <i>who</i> is following you. A network made off a few hundred interesting, engaging and content sharing folk is far more powerful than 10,000 who ignore you. I think increasingly it&#8217;s going to become about optimisation.</p><p>Thanks for your comment. <img
src='http://twittercism.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tina Louise</title><link>http://twittercism.com/five-people/comment-page-1/#comment-628</link> <dc:creator>Tina Louise</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:42:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twittercism.com/?p=917#comment-628</guid> <description>Clear, interesting, well written article that posed interesting points, thank you.I wonder though at the whole numbers thing - I don&#039;t think we all think about how many followers we have. If they follow it is lovely, but not essential surely, to the Twitter experience?I extend my awareness of the points of view on subjects/news items etc through Twitter. Sometimes I interact with personalities who traditionally are unreachable and always, I leave Twitter with something more than I started with... and the followers made no difference to any of that.Thanks for adding to my thoughts :)Namaste,
Tina</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clear, interesting, well written article that posed interesting points, thank you.</p><p>I wonder though at the whole numbers thing &#8211; I don&#8217;t think we all think about how many followers we have. If they follow it is lovely, but not essential surely, to the Twitter experience?</p><p>I extend my awareness of the points of view on subjects/news items etc through Twitter. Sometimes I interact with personalities who traditionally are unreachable and always, I leave Twitter with something more than I started with&#8230; and the followers made no difference to any of that.</p><p>Thanks for adding to my thoughts <img
src='http://twittercism.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Namaste,<br
/> Tina</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: twittercism.com @ 2010-03-21 05:32:43 by W3 Total Cache -->