<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: All Jokes Aside, Does Twitter Need To Go Pro?</title> <atom:link href="http://twittercism.com/does-twitter-need-to-go-pro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://twittercism.com/does-twitter-need-to-go-pro/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:39:07 +0100</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: KeLopez_CL</title><link>http://twittercism.com/does-twitter-need-to-go-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link> <dc:creator>KeLopez_CL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 03:09:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twittercism.com/?p=379#comment-344</guid> <description>Everything was a April Fools&#039; Day joke</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything was a April Fools&#8217; Day joke</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sheamus</title><link>http://twittercism.com/does-twitter-need-to-go-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link> <dc:creator>Sheamus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:51:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twittercism.com/?p=379#comment-196</guid> <description>It is happening, though. They &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessinsider.com/twitter-confirms-paid-pro-accounts-on-the-way-2009-3&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;announced it yesterday&lt;/a&gt;, although details are yet to emerge on which particular bangs you&#039;ll get for your buck.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is happening, though. They <a
href="http://www.businessinsider.com/twitter-confirms-paid-pro-accounts-on-the-way-2009-3" rel="nofollow">announced it yesterday</a>, although details are yet to emerge on which particular bangs you&#8217;ll get for your buck.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fudgeit</title><link>http://twittercism.com/does-twitter-need-to-go-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link> <dc:creator>fudgeit</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:53:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twittercism.com/?p=379#comment-180</guid> <description>find those ideas pretty awful though and don&#039;t think i could bring myself to pay for one of those. sigh, i guess it all depends on what folk actually want from twitter.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>find those ideas pretty awful though and don&#8217;t think i could bring myself to pay for one of those. sigh, i guess it all depends on what folk actually want from twitter.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: teraom</title><link>http://twittercism.com/does-twitter-need-to-go-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link> <dc:creator>teraom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:05:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://twittercism.com/?p=379#comment-129</guid> <description>I came with twitter premium mockup images. Check out
http://www.teraom.com/2008/11/twitter-monetization-channels/
quite funny.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came with twitter premium mockup images. Check out<br
/> <a
href="http://www.teraom.com/2008/11/twitter-monetization-channels/" rel="nofollow">http://www.teraom.com/2008/11/twitter-monetization-channels/</a><br
/> quite funny.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: twittercism.com @ 2010-03-20 15:00:37 by W3 Total Cache -->