Your Reputation On Twitter Matters – Why Is There No @Abuse Team For Defamation?
About six weeks ago I wrote an article on Twittercism entitled, “Why Replies On Twitter Are Far More Damaging Than Direct Messages“. The general point was that while various protective measures are applied to the direct message system to prevent abuse, anybody can send a reply to anybody else on Twitter, whether you’re following each other, or not.
Moreover, those replies, even if one or both of the parties has blocked the other, go into the Twitter stream, and are viewable by anybody else on the platform, through search, and so on. So, you can essentially say whatever you like, and it remains ‘out there’.
This is a big problem for Twitter, and nobody seems to be doing anything about it.
Check out Twitter’s terms of service (a one-page summary is viewable here). Twitter provides legislation about the use of the platform in various ways, including (direct quotes):
- Impersonation: You may not impersonate others through the Twitter service in a manner that does or is intended to mislead, confuse, or deceive others
- Privacy: You may not publish or post other people’s private and confidential information, such as credit card numbers, street address or Social Security/National Identity numbers, without their express authorization and permission.
- Violence and Threats: You may not publish or post direct, specific threats of violence against others.
This is all fine, and there are various other service limitations that I encourage you to read. The problem is that none of them in any way concern the problem of defamation; that is, one user saying something libellous about another.
This happens all the time on Twitter. It’s happened to me on several occasions. It’s happened to lots of people I know. It’s possibly happened to you. You may not even be aware of it, and that might lead you to believe that it then doesn’t matter, but it does. Why? Because potentially millions of other people might have seen that message about you.
What I’d like to see Twitter do is add another entry to their TOS that says something like:
- Defamation: Users may not publish or post libellous or knowingly fabricated allegations against others
And with that, what I think Twitter has long needed is a way to flag individual tweets for abuse. We can already report spam accounts to @Spam – Twitter needs an @Abuse team that investigates all reports that concern defamation (as well as violent threats, etc, as per their TOS) and responds accordingly.
(Incidentally, there is already an @abuse account – he seems a charming fellow. I don’t see Twitter having much problems getting that back.)
Reputation is important, and increasingly so in the online world. The last thing anybody wants to see on Twitter is lawyers. That’s an inevitability to some extent, as any public message system is going to see things being said and done that will lead to legal action. But by taking this relatively simple step themselves – and yes, maybe having a lawyer or two on staff to make knowledgeable decisions – they can prevent the courts getting involved over every little thing. We’ve already had a silly situation with St. Louis Cardinals manager Tony La Russa suing the network.
As it is, people have told me they are reporting issues regarding defamation to Twitter and not getting a response. Twitter’s help ticket system is lousy enough as it is, but at least the @Spam account seems to serve a genuine purpose and, you know, do something. An @Abuse team seems a logical and necessary next step.
Of course, the reality here is this will probably only come to pass once a celebrity gets seriously defamed on the network – the legal threats that will follow an issue of that kind of magnitude will get an army of lawyers involved, and produce scores of column inches amidst Daily Mail-esque ‘end of civilisation’ reportage. My gut feeling says it will probably involve P. Diddy.
If Biz, Jack and Evan act now, and implement the necessary procedures, we can avoid a lot of this kind of thing and get on with the business of Twitter. The money flow goes both ways, lads.
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!






I disagree with you to a certain extent. I think that we all know that Twitter is a very public place and anything goes. In reality, it has changed so much since its creation due to its popularity that the owners are probably a bit confused about what to do about anything these days.
However, I think that being on Twitter is like being a celebrity where the paparazzi don’t give a damn about your privacy and can legally get away with it.
Juscelino M. Acevedo’s last blog post..Why Radio & TV Hate Your Kids
I think increasingly as the internet reflects and adopts the policies and principles of ‘real life’ you’re going to have to start enforcing certain things, and that includes libel. When we consider the implications for the newspaper industry as an entity at the moment and the likelihood that everything will be online within the next decade or so, it makes sense to me that if you cannot publish something in a newspaper that is libellous, those same restrictions need to apply online. There’s no reason I can think of why Twitter, or any social network, should be afforded an ‘anything goes’ stance to statements made within its infrastructure.
It’s a much greyer area here, of course, and it’s one of the reasons why I’m not a big fan of anonymity on the internet, certainly in communities. Having a strong opinion is admirable and to be encouraged, so stand up and be accountable, and all that. Anybody can have brass-sized balls behind a proxy. I’m a huge believer in the very literal definition of freedom of speech, but that’s more to do the ability to be able to express a belief or an opinion – intentionally (and outwardly) defaming somebody is a very different thing.
The paps taking photos isn’t quite the same thing as defamation, unless they use those photos within a story that is false. It’s more of a privacy issue, and that’s something Twitter is going to have to look at, too. It’s all related, of course.
Don’t get me wrong. I agree that something needs to be done about it. The problem is that nobody really knows what to do about it. When you suggest the “Defamation” entry into the TOS, it is a wonderful idea, but someone is either going to find an issue with it or a loophole.
At the same time, with the current state of the internet with virtually no “rules”, I don’t think that people should expect privacy, then be upset when they are “violated”. Although it is slightly different, look at how many government and big corporate laptops get stolen with vital information.
Juscelino M. Acevedo’s last blog post..TwtMailer: Get Your @replies Sent Straight To Your Inbox
I think defamation is defamation, really; if you can get sued for it in a newspaper, you should be able to get sued for it online, too. Anonymity on Twitter is not really an issue as most people sign up with a proper email address. Those that don’t and defame (or spam or whatever) should just be removed. As said, a proper abuse team could handle all these issues with relative ease, much like @Spam does now.
I think Twitter’s verification plans (which is in the link in the article, too) are a step in the right direction. Increasingly people who aren’t accountable online will be awarded less and less significance. And that’s the way it needs to be, I believe.
Completely agree Sheamus. This isn’t a privacy issue per se. Anyone on Twitter understands it is a public space. But it is not true that in public spaces “anything goes.” Free speech has to be balanced against competing interests, including those reflected in libel laws. The problem is that, at the moment, Twitter is ducking the issue, no doubt because it does not wish to be deemed a “publisher” for legal purposes. I think that’s wrong. It is storing up its liabilities and, as Shea suggests, one of these days this will come back to haunt them.
I completely agree with “defamation is defamation”. My disagreement is in the fact that the same laws do not apply to the internet (yet). They are not going to get this right anytime soon. There are too many scam artists out there (as you made us aware in a previous article) for rules or laws that we can trust on the internet.
It really has nothing to do with proxies and spoofing or anything of that nature. It has to do with the internet in general being such a great resource that the bad people know how to take advantage.
Juscelino M. Acevedo’s last blog post..Why Pay For Computer Security?
Somebody very close to me has been a victim of Twitter defamation, and I totally agree with this post. Someone has been setting up accounts of “@(friend’s name)sucks” and worse, then following me and all of his target’s friends and posting awful things about my friend. Downright slanderous/libelous to the point that my friend is afraid he may lose his job and is concerned for his safety. We’ve contacted twitter about this, and they’ve disabled accounts that this person has set up, but they keep appearing. And meanwhile I’m taking screen shots of everything before it disappears.
It’s really sad that somebody has nothing better to do than waste time on a smear campaign like this, and when it happens to somebody close to you and all that can be done is disabling an account, well, you feel pretty helpless.
Stacy Lukas’s last blog post..It’s time to play: Computer shortcuts I want for real life!
I’m sorry to hear that Stacy. I’ve experienced it myself to a lesser degree in the past, and it’s never pleasant. Of course, your example is why something like an @abuse facility is necessary at Twitter – assuming they pay attention. I’m surprised they haven’t blocked the IP address of the individual in question.
So am I, but there’s a possibility that there is more than one person involved, and a strong probability that they’re using more than one location to do it from.
Stacy Lukas’s last blog post..It’s time to play: Computer shortcuts I want for real life!
Although I still believe what I stated yesterday to be correct, Stacy’s situation puts a different perspective that I did not consider. I would be pretty upset if some creates an @somebody_sucks and Twitter does not do anything about it.
Juscelino M. Acevedo’s last blog post..5 Reasons Linux Will Never Be Better Than Windows (Or Mac) [Digg]