16 Reasons Why We Might Unfollow You On Twitter
This topic has come up a few times from different users within the Twitter stream over the past couple of days and the responses have been quite interesting.
Why do you unfollow somebody on Twitter? Why would you want to? And are you doing anything that might increase the chances of getting unfollowed yourself?

I have my reasons which I’ll list below, mixed with the opinions of other (anonymous) folk which I’ve observed. As said some of these seem to be fairly standard amongst all users, but there are one or two that are fairly controversial and certainly require some personal thought and weighing of the pros and cons.
You’re A Spammer
These are the easiest users to unfollow.
Most of the time it’s very obvious when an account is a spammer. First and foremost, they nearly always have a very skewed ratio of those they are following to those they are being followed by. Most of the time they don’t even have a profile avatar, and if they do it’s usually an attractive female.
They will also often have a username such as ’5Gbpk3′. I mean, how do you even pronounce that?
Finally, there just aren’t that many free Macbook Airs to give away in the world, so making the decision to get rid of these people from your follow list doesn’t require a lot of thought. Most of these accounts are bots, anyway. They won’t even notice, or mind.
It’s not just the bots, though. For me personally, if I get a direct message pushing a product seconds after following somebody, more often than not I will immediately unfollow, and then block them.
Tip: Always block spammers. Don’t just unfollow them. If an account gets enough blocks, it raises a red flag within Twitter and they will get removed pretty soon afterwards.
You Only Talk About Yourself Or Your Product
I’ve mentioned before that the majority of successful users on Twitter (assuming you measure success by popularity) are gifted in the art of self-promotion. It’s not a bad thing; these people aren’t spammers (not all of them, anyway). But they excel in marketing themselves, as well as – and this is the key part – others within their niche, and the niche itself.
However, some folks you follow on Twitter will do nothing but market themselves. It’ll be endless links back to their blog, re-tweets of the same thing, open questions about their products, carefully crafted remarks about how ‘only their Twitter followers can get these discounts’, and so on.
And they don’t even have to be selling anything, either. If all you do is talk about yourself, that amounts to basically the same thing. The key part here is ratio. It’s okay to promote yourself or your product, but if that’s all you do, you have to expect it will irritate or bore a lot of people.
You Use Too Many Hashtags
Hashtags are fairly useful, certainly if used infrequently. Why? Because the more you use them for every little thing, the more redundant they become. I mean, there’s even a fairly popular #twitter hashtag now. What? We’re on Twitter. What next, #tweet? #life? #reality?
What irks me a little is there are some users who include about four or five hashtags with every tweet, often tagging words that are pretty generic. It can become a little tiresome.
You Take ‘What Are You Doing?’ Far Too Literally
Yes, I’m sitting on a chair typing on my computer while using Twitter, too.
There’s absolutely a place within Twitter for the inane and the trite. I like to share the odd tweet about what and where I’m eating, what I’m buying and where I’m going out tonight, but it again comes back down to ratio. If that’s all I was tweeting about, I’d absolutely expect people to be utterly bored of me within a couple of days.
You Never Reply
This is a personal bugaboo of mine. It’s one thing if you’re very, very famous and busy indeed, have 250,000+ followers and can’t possibly keep up with all the questions and comments you receive, especially as many of them are the same ones each and every day. I can understand that to a point.
But, then I look at users like @Agent_M and @Wossy who are amongst the most-followed people on Twitter and they go out of their way to engage with the community. Conversely, there are some people on the network with maybe a couple of thousand followers who seem to believe they’re just far too important to take five seconds of their time to respond to your question.
I’ve seen this enough for it to be a niggle. I can understand that for many power-users on Twitter they get the same stuff each and every day. But if I ask a genuine, intelligent question about an item or product of which you are considered an expert in your field, and you ignore it, what does that tell me about you and your organisation?
I say we should, where at all possible, treat tweets like SMS text messages. If it’s open-ended or a joke, then a reply is welcome but certainly not essential. If it’s a reasonable question and you have a moment, do reply, or if you’re busy, favourite the tweet and reply later. It takes seconds to do this. Are you that important?
You’re Rude
If somebody is rude or obnoxious towards me, certainly more than once – and this includes ‘real-life’ friends and contacts, I find myself torn between ignoring or actually unfollowing them. Or maybe even a block is called for, as otherwise they can still receive and @reply to your submissions.
And it’s not just rudeness sent my way. If I’m following the stream and see somebody going out of their way to belittle another user, they’ll be very quick on to my chopping block. It doesn’t matter how influential they are.
We’ll all have our own limits and expectations as to what constitutes civility, but there’s a line for everybody. If you cross it, expect to be unfollowed.
We Don’t Share Common Interests
This is going to happen from time to time. You’ll follow somebody whose interests and opinions are wildly different or even polar opposites to your own. Sometimes this is a good thing – there’s rarely an absolute ‘right and wrong’ in most discussions – but on occasion it’ll just irritate you and/or them.
You’re Tweeting In A Language We Don’t Understand
I’ve written about this before. It’s still fairly rare on Twitter to be followed by somebody who never tweets in English, but it does happen and will of course become very common as Twitter goes global. Right now, I’m torn between being seen as rude or ignorant, but there really isn’t much point in following somebody who doesn’t tweet anything that I can actually read.
You Tweet Too Much
This is a bit hypocritical as I tweet a fair bit myself, and I’m sure it bugs some people. Certainly for my followers who follow less than fifty or so people it must seem like on some days that I am Twitter.
That said, I don’t get an enormous amount of unfollows so hopefully I’m doing something right. Some people, however, tweet endlessly about things that you will not find interesting at all. Or they’ll use a service that allows them to schedule their tweets and they’ll come through suddenly in a block of 5-10 at once. I hate that. I nearly always unfollow accounts that do this. It’s supremely irritating.
Tweet as much as you like. There are no hard and fast rules about what is considered acceptable limits. But for everybody’s sake, please, don’t be boring.
You Argue For The Sake Of It
Years back, I was very guilty of this kind of attitude myself, and can still drift into it from time to time if I’m not careful. Some call it playing Devil’s Advocate, others call it being an ass. Your call. Either way, you’ll come across people who will want to argue every little point you make to the nth degree. You’ll exchange a few tweets and it might even move to direct messages, but eventually you’ll get bored and maybe frustrated because this other individual just will not let anything go. If it’s public and you have a lot of cross-followers it can be both irritating to them and potentially embarrassing to you.
It can be a bit harsh but sometimes an unfollow, or even a block, is the only way to go. Otherwise it’s a lifetime of banging your head against a brick wall.
You Openly Discuss Personal Stuff
Twitter is a public place but some folks either forget about this or don’t care, and it can get a bit too much.
You’re A Friend Who Openly Discusses Personal Stuff
This for me is a big no-go area. If I’m friends with you offline as well as on, that’s great. I value that friendship. Don’t then stamp all over it by trying to embarrass me publically or revealing something we’ve discussed or experienced privately.
You’re Too Negative
To quote Fake Steve Jobs, negative people upset me. In part this is psychological. I’ve been guilty of being a ‘hater’ myself in the past, or certainly both cynical and critical, but I’ve worked hard to move beyond it. So if I see this attitude in other people, it rings alarm bells, mostly because it reminds me of how I used to be and how I must have come across to other people. It’s a useless position to be in, winning few friends. Absolutely have an opinion and if you believe in something strongly enough by all means defend it, but don’t just stamp all over things because you can. Comments like ‘Apple sucks’ or ‘chart music is rubbish’ don’t really do much for anybody. Certainly not you.
You’re Too Positive
Not every day is a great day, alright? I overslept, have a bit of a hangover, forgot to finish my project last night and the cat decided to use the kitchen as a bathroom. It’s wonderful that you’re all chipper and want to pay it forward, but sometimes, just sometimes, I’m not in the mood.
You Tweet In Txt Spk
If you’re 13, then it’s kind of a given. If you’re old enough to vote, you’re old enough to use proper words. I mean, you can do what you like, but so can the rest of us: unfollow.
You Don’t Follow Back
This is a bit controversial. For many people Twitter is a game, and they treat it like MySpace, assuming that the person with the most followers wins. This is true to some extent, certainly when it comes to influence and the power to move eyeballs to a website or product, and I’ve written about this subject within this very blog.
Hence, the goal for many is to amass a large number of follows in the hope that by doing so they themselves will be followed back. This is a system that does work (although the value of such a network is very much open to debate).
Conversely, there are other people who will almost always follow somebody back who follows them, including such heavyweights as @guykawasaki and @scobleizer.
So, what to do if you follow somebody but they never follow you back? You have to make a value judgement about what this person brings to your stream. I’m fortunate enough that some of the Twitter elite follow me back, including @copyblogger, @jackschofield, @scobleizer, @shelisrael, @chrisgarratt and @chrisbrogan. I enjoy and look for these folks’ submissions and to be honest whether they read mine or not, it gives me a warm, fuzzy feeling inside that my tweets have some chance of crossing their path.
And being frank, even if these guys weren’t following me, I’d still follow them. This is the case for a lot of people who don’t follow me on Twitter, too. A few of these are celebrities, and a few are just really excellent bloggers and writers, or specialists in their field. Or just plain old-fashioned interesting. I’m fine with that. Would I like them to follow me? Sure, but I don’t need them to. I get a lot of value from their stuff. That’s good enough for me.
(UPDATE Feb 2010: Back when I wrote this post, I used to follow everybody back. I no longer do this for various reasons. Read more about why this has become an increasingly common practice here.)
Conclusion
Phew, quite a list. And there is probably a lot of stuff I’ve overlooked or forgotten about.
I don’t want to come across as overly critical or sensitive when it comes to who I unfollow. And I certainly don’t want to appear to be bringing the commandments down from the mountaintop. I’m fairly confident my tweets irritate a lot of people, too. And I fully expect to lose a few folk just by writing this article.
But this isn’t my list. As I said way back at the start, a lot of these reasons are fairly commonplace amongst the Twittersphere. Most people are prepared to let bygones be bygones – I certainly am – but there are limits.
To be honest, the vast majority of people I cut off are spammers. After that it’s probably the uber self-promoters, then rude people and those that never reply. But this isn’t something I find myself doing all the time. I estimate, spammers aside, I probably unfollow 1-2 people per day, maximum.
That said, I do believe that looking at your followers once a week or fortnight, and having a bit of a ‘clean out’ can work wonders for the Twitter experience. If you’re unsure about whether to unfollow somebody, give it 24 hours or so. If they’re still tweeting in a way that you don’t like or have no interest in, that’s more than enough time. Remember: you don’t have to follow anybody. The experience should be a positive one. If an individual is in any way making you miserable, give ‘em the boot.
I’d be interested to hear your own thoughts on this. Why do you unfollow somebody on Twitter?
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!






This is a very valuable and awesome post. A MUST READ for any Tweep. Already RTd it. Thanks again!
I’d also add “Most of Your Tweets Are Auto-Generated by Posting Bots”.
There’s many services out there, usually provided by other social networks, that will automatically generate tweets based on your activities. WordPress plugins will automatically post the title and link of your latest article. Blip.fm will automatically post details of each track you listen to on your mp3 player. The list goes on.
I don’t mind a bit of auto-generated content intertwined with actual user-generated tweets, but when it becomes clear that the human being behind the account has no intention of interacting with anyone, leaving these bots to generate their tweets, I’ll usually pull the plug.
There are a few exceptions. For instance, there are quite a few gaming web sites who use Twitter exclusively to post links to new articles on their web site. That’s fine, because I find those links useful and will configure TweetDeck to funnel them into their own “Gaming & Tech News” group. Besides, most of the writers and editors for those web sites also have their own personal Twitter accounts, so I still get the benefit of their interaction too.
That’s useful. Watching someone listen to the same Blink 182 album over and over again, all day long, isn’t.
@Julio
Thank you! Much appreciated.
@Mark
Yeah, that stuff bugs me too. I’ve written in some detail about why I switched off my blip.fm connection to Twitter, as it slightly irritates me when I see lots of blips coming through and I assume I’d therefore be irritating other folk by doing it, too. Looks like I made the right choice.
Cheers for your comments guys.
What about, if you’ve changed what you twitter about since I started following you? I sign up to follow your journey accross Europe/progress on songwriting etc, and now you’re back home sending tweets about your local election or a sudden descent into romantic agony. Please don’t take it personally, but that’s not what I want to follow.
Or even, I got bored following you? I don’t take it personally if someone unfollows me, even if I should notice more than most.
Steve
@Tim
Thanks.
@Steve
There’s definitely an argument for a fluid approach to following an individual on Twitter, and we all absolutely have the right to step aside when the thing that attracted us to that person has changed. Your example is a good one, but we might also do this for an account used specifically for the NCAA college basketball tournament, or for the run of a TV show, and so on.
The problem is that by abstaining for their feed we then lose the facility to know when to pick up with that person again. We could check their Twitter profile but then you might as well just follow them.
Hence, I wonder if it’s a case of taking the bad with the good (assuming that there’s a chance the user might return to their old ways), or maybe some kind of tool can be implemented where we can have Twitter (or an external app) letting us know when a given Twitterer starts using certain keywords, etc. It’d be fairly complex/erratic but might be doable.
Cheers for your comments.
Thoughtful, useful and comprehensive. Thanks.
Tim
Really interesting article and very useful. I consider myself a ‘inexperienced’ twitter but feel the same annoyance at a lot of reasons for unfollowing people. I get quite offended by the people that refuse to follow me even though I have made several relevant comments about their discussion. I get the impression they think they are above following certain people as they have 1400 followers – whoopee.
I am considering unfollowing someone as it gets a bit boring having a one-sided ‘conversation’. Also I get irked by some people’s obsession with increasing their following- surely quality is better than quantity.
There moan done. Thank you, Sheamus, for giving something to rant about.
You’re very welcome Nova (what a great name). And it’s nice to see you here.
I think a big part of ‘getting’ Twitter is socialising and that can only come with a reasonable amount of followers (as well as people you’re following yourself), but I agree that trying to amass a huge number simply for that reason alone doesn’t have a lot of merit.
If you consistently provide interesting tweets as you grow, then fine, but even if you manage to get 50,000+ followers it’s not much use unless you can actually do something with it. Twitter, as far as I know, don’t give you a prize or anything.
Far more beneficial (to all) to follow and be followed by relevant people than just any and everyone. As I said, it’s isn’t, and never should be MySpace. The only people who can ‘win’ anything with bazillions of followers is those with something useful to say and/or promote.
Everything you said makes sense to me. An excellent summary.
Since I started using Socialtoo I’ve noticed something…twitter seems to unfollow people on occasion. The only reason I find out now is because I look at the list of unfollows daily and see that I am no longer following someone I actually enjoy following. All too often their “auto-unfollow if someone unfollows you” rule kicks in. Re-following them usually reconnects us but I wish I knew why that happened and how to stop it.
Hi Susan. I use Socialtoo as well and like the service, but I’ve also had that happen to me. Moreover, yesterday Socialtoo added over 100 people to my follow list in one go. They were all following me, but clearly the system had picked up a bit of a backlog and then decided to give them to me all at once.
For the last week or so they’ve also been telling me (in their daily emails) that I’ve been getting zero followed, zero unfollowed, which I know is not true.
I hope these are temporary glitches as I find the service useful.
Appreciate your comments.
“You Tweet Too Much” is a personal pet peeve of mine. @zaibatsu and @rdavidian are two examples of users I’ve unfollowed simply because they clog my tweet stream.
On the other hand, users like @freelance_jobs also tweet often and in large batches, but I’m actually interested in reading these tweets.
As an aside, @zaibatsu also falls into a couple of your other categories for me, but I won’t get into bashing here. Let’s just say I enjoyed unfollowing him.
If someone follows me and I don’t know them offline, I look at their twitter stream. If it’s not spam, and if it’s in English at least sometimes, I’ll probably follow it.
If it’s content that I’m not sure I want in my twitter stream, I’ll leave them as a follower of mine and check on their twitter stream now and then. Sometimes I follow them later, sometimes not.
I haven’t unfollowed many people. Most times, they didn’t seem to be spammers at first, but later on they showed their true nature. Right about then is when I say NO to spam and block the culprit.
I have to admit to being semi-guilty of not answering replies, but that’s largely because I didn’t notice the darn tab where I could see the @gabey8 tweets for a good few months after I started to tweet regularly. Uh, whoops.
i guess i am in a minority b/c i LIKE for the ppl i follow to send links, but if a person MOSTLY tweets links (*ahem*) and very little ~ less than 10%, say ~ personal tweets, i get bored w/ them quickly. i don’t click a whole lot of links, esp if they are topic-centric; i like a good mix, 50% social, 50% networking (or promotion).
but again i realize i am most likely in the minority here.
I’m not sure you necessarily are. I would imagine if one could accurately gauge all Twitter users most people on the network probably do a little of both (if not more towards the personal stuff). One of the best aspects of Twitter is we can shape our own network; if we don’t like the way a certain person is behaving, even if it’s admirable to many other users, we can simply unfollow them.
Thanks for your comment Kayce.
I’d have to agree with most of your comments above although I do take exception with the “follow me back” comment. The only reason that they would need to follow you back is so that you could DM them. You can still reply to someone who isn’t following you and they can reply to you. That may lead to a follow down the road.
So my advise is to follow anyone you find interesting whether they follow you back or not.
You can still reply to someone, of course, but if you kept a discourse going for days/weeks/months and they never followed you back (or vice versa), wouldn’t that be a bit of a slap in the face?
I still think it’s curious that Twitter allows you to @reply anybody but only DM those who are following you. Strange decision process there. The @reply is potentially far more damaging.
If you’ve got a discourse going then I can’t imagine them not following unless they’re clueless. I suppose it does happen though — they must be interested in the conversation itself and not you in general. If this is happening through hashtags I can see that.
I hadn’t thought about the reply being more damaging, but I suppose that you are right on that. At least a DM is supposed to be private.
It does happen. I won’t name names but I’ve had more than a couple of people I’ve been following who I had various conversations with, some in-depth, who never followed me back. (Others, who then went on to unfollow me, after weeks/months of back-and-forths. We can all say we did it ‘accidentally’, but I wonder.
)
Fair point about being interested in the conversation itself. But if these folk had never followed you, how would they know?
And that’s exactly it on DMs. I think the point is that ‘important’ people aren’t forced to put up with the DMs of their 500,000+ followers. But they get more replies, because that’s a far less prohibitive means of communication for many. And of course all those replies are ‘out there’, can be tracked down and read by all, then re-tweeted, and re-tweeted, and re-tweeted…
Some major allegations will be made soon on Twitter* and it will become public record. Then it’s going to turn ugly.
* Not by me.
I hope that this kind of stuff never happens, but we are dealing with people 8=)
One thing that is probably a shame is that when the inevitable happens Twitter will become even more popular as people come to check out the carnage.
Indeed. The first major wave of popularity came with the A-list celebrities and the media attention that followed. We’ll have a nice X number of months of relative tranquility, with the biggest nuisances being worms/exploits and Twitter problems, and then something vicious will take place, and the media will do a bit of an about-turn.
When that happens, I predict two changes: one, many people will go private on Twitter, and two, celebrities/brands will have to weigh up the pros and cons of convenient and massive audiences over public name-calling and criticism. There’s only so many times an actor, director, writer or company will be publically told ‘you suck’ (en masse) before they reconsider their options.
Come on, man. You can’t imagine? Long form discourse is a whole different thing than little tweets. Some people are good at one and bad at the other.
It’s not a slap in the face to not be followed. You have to earn followers on your merits. It’s not an entitlement.
A follow is not the same as a “thank you”. It represents an ongoing commitment to spend precious attention on you.
excellent advice, especially for a newbie like me. i’ve learned quickly to regularly check who is following me, and if it is not a spammer or bot (with nothing but adverts on their tweets) then i usually block them since i don’t want to read their stuff. i also make sure the people i follow (but they don’t necessarily follow me back) are legits–for example news feeds, celebrities, local stuff. i am finding twitter a commercial version of facebook. at least i’m not getting the meanies from high school trying to be all friendly and stuff with me long after graduation.
Add “You use auto DMs” to this list. It’s disrespectful of my inbox and shows that the person (ironically, it is usually the self-proclaimed “social media experts” who do this most often) lacks even the most remedial understanding of “conversation” and “community.”
That being said, if it’s not a numbers game, then who cares why people unfollow?
Great article-one thing though, I get caught up in projects (I tweet in the lulls) and sometimes do not have the energy to tweet or read tweets-I have my contact info on my site-if anyone has a question I would want them to call even email can get dicey–I love Twitter; also some folks are not up to par on using Direct Messages, Retweets, and replies. I think applications will continue to grow and make it easier to Tweet. I would also add one-I unfollow those who never Tweet. (although your automated rule maybe covers that)- I subscribed to your feed and signed up to disqus- very informative blog.
http://twitter.com/evespride
Great post. I would just add porn starS and deviants who post stuff ive never heard of. Makes me blush…andD not in a good way. Lol.
Hope this blasts all over Twitter space;) will RT. Thanks.
Thanks for the thoughtfully prepared and presented list.
I don’t do a lot of active unfollowing but there are some I’m inclined not to follow in the first place. Apart from your excellent list I include:
* Your profile tells me nothing “real” about you
* Your profile tells me nothing “real” and the web link is to a sales landing page, a.k.a. “flycatcher”
* You don’t have a picture of yourself (are “you” a person or a bot?)
* Following 999 and 65 followers, 1 update – (are you serious?)
* You are a corporation posing as an individual
* You are a corporation and openly so, pumping out promos for your brands
Also I do actively unfollow people who use foul language (and I don’t mean the odd word here and there).
The auto DMS that really get to me are the ones that come after someone has followed me, I have taken the trouble to look at their blog or other site, DMd them with a friendly comment on something I could probably only have known from doing that and then get their DM saying “click here to find out about me” – i.e. they have the thing running on auto and are not reading their own DMs.
I don’t feel obliged to follow everyone back. There are so many spammers and hucksters that I feel any of us who want to be taken seriously as part of the community and would like to be followed back owe it to ourselves to be open about who we are and willing to join in the conversation.
.-= Des Walsh´s last blog ..Clay Shirky on Historical Significance of Social Media =-.
I don’t understand the whole follow-back culture. It seems like mutual assured insincerity, to me.
I follow only those people who tweet in a way that attracts my attention. And I want followers (I HATE that word but thanks to the verbal incompetence of Twitter visionaries we’re all forced to use it) who find my own tweets worthy. That’s all. Don’t “follow” me if I bore you, please!
Since I subscribe to so few people, when I do that, it means their ideas, feelings, and well-being actually matter to me. Anyone who looks at my 20x follower/following ratio would might infer that.
Often, I will closely follow an interesting blog, but find the same person’s tweets to be not very interesting. This is the case with you. I don’t understand that phenomenon either. You are an excellent writer with wonderful insights about social media. I read your blog and find that it illuminates the Tweeting world for me. Still, I PROMISE you that I will follow you only when at least one out of five of your tweets make me say “ooh!”
@jamesmarcusbach
this article is great
and I am the bottom one on your list, I always follow others who have the same or similar interests as myself, and if they cannot be bothered to follow me back then I will dump them faster than anything. Every now and then I go through my list and see whats what and have a good clear out 
.-= Michelle´s last blog ..Create frozen liquid effects =-.
You said: ” there are other people who will almost always follow somebody back who follows them. I count myself amongst this list,” but you only follow 299 of almost 4000 followers, so what happened?
.-= Maria´s last blog ..Top Ten Must Have Plugins For WordPress Newbies =-.
I wisened up.
You have to remember this article was published eight months ago – that’s a couple of lifetimes in social media. Things change, and we’re always learning. My policy hasn’t been to auto-follow back for months now. The same became true (eventually) for many Twitter heavyweights, like @scobleizer and @jesse.
For more on my change-of-heart, try these articles:
http://twittercism.com/mass-unfollowing/
http://twittercism.com/why-unfollow/
http://twittercism.com/unfollow-fear/
Thanks for the reply, I do agree that for the well known Twitter users it can become impossible to follow everyone. After reading your posts I cleared out my list and followed more people who are following me. But this also can be a hard choice because for a lot of followers I have nothing in common with and so I really dont want to follow them, but I feel really bad about it.
.-= Maria´s last blog ..Top Ten Must Have Plugins For WordPress Newbies =-.
I’m loving it, provides me an insight I don’t already know. TBH it’s been bothering me a lot, especially since I know those who unfollow me is due to the fact that I tweet a lot.
But I do suspect that that the real reason behind this is that the majority of these ppl follow only less than a hundred people, and most probably out of that hundred, most do not even tweet on a daily basis, hence making mine look like a series of spam, whether or not it’s beneficial to them.
So i can’t really blame them. Some even went as far as to say they still do check my tweets every now and then via my blog, just so that I know why, and that’s appreciated
That’s my view of it, hope it’s relevant
Just a correction, I don’t follow back people who follow me. I keep the two separate. I follow people who regularly talk about technology. Period. If you don’t, I probably won’t follow you. I follow about 17,000 right now, all hand added in just the last 10 months (early last year I deleted everyone I was following and started over — before that I was following everyone who followed me and it just was a very lame policy on my part). That’s less than 17% of the people who follow me, by the way. Love the list. By the way, of the 17,000 people I’m following about 9,500 don’t follow me back. Which is just fine, I regularly break many of the rules you give on this post.
.-= Robert Scoble´s last blog ..Google’s two-front war with Apple and Facebook; who are the winners and the losers? =-.
Yes, I realised you changed your stance a while back Robert (and wrote about it here). This is actually one of my older articles (March 2009) but it remains tellingly valid (which is staggering, really) and had picked up a bit of organic traffic today, so I figured I’d give it a kick.
Still, outdated is outdated, so I’ll edit your mention above.
Thank you…I hope more twitter-ers read this and understand!
Jenn